The Revision Letter: Why and How to Follow it to a T

Hey authors, we have a secret for you! The magical way to firmly entrench yourself in the coveted position of an editor’s good graces. Ready to hear it? It’s simple—just follow a revision letter to a T, and we will love you forever!

Now we know what you’re thinking: I always try to follow revision letters. And I think I’m doing everything you ask. But something must have gone haywire in communication because you come back to me for more revisions. What did I do wrong?

Revising is tough. We get it. Sometimes our ideas and reasons for having a character do X instead of Y make perfect sense in our heads, and we think we’re conveying exactly what we mean in our revision letter, but what you read and what we wrote are actually coming across like two totally different languages. German and Swahili. Arabic and Spanish. Or maybe just Editor-Ese and Writer-Ese. So how do we all get on the same page (literally)?

It’s important to understand the reasoning behind a change an editor is asking for. Especially if it’s something major, like a plotline, character’s motivation or deleting an entire character altogether. If your editor hasn’t laid it out in a clear enough way that you understand and agree with, probe further. Ask more questions. If you’re just blindly making a change because your editor said to, the changes you make won’t necessarily be stronger. Plus, you’ll learn for next time that, say, having your heroine’s estranged cousin come back into her life and reconcile with her at the end of the story doesn’t work because it distracts from the purpose of the book and creates a contrived relationship that’s totally separate from and unnecessary to the main storyline.

You might often be asked for revisions to a character’s goals, motivation or conflict. A realistic book with stakes and heart is going to need these three things in sufficient doses. So one revision note might be, what is Mandy’s goal in the scene when she looks up her cousin with the intention of reconnecting? Why does she want this reunion in the first place? Such revision points should cause you to question your own choices for your characters and story. If you can stand by your decisions, by all means, give your editor your rationale and have a conversation. The key is to ask if you’re still confused about a certain point after reading through the revision letter. It can never hurt to get more information.

Among other things, we might ask in revision letters for more development of the romance, slowing down or speeding up the pacing of the story or romance, beefing up a character’s past or romantic conflict, and so on. These are all important things that are sometimes not brought out in early drafts. Additionally, we might give some pointers on the mechanics of writing, though we generally expect the authors to acquire this knowledge on their own. We might question why the hero is hiding his true identity, or some fact that seems important, from the heroine. If it seems unethical or makes him seem less appealing, we’ll probably note that, and we can discuss whether the deceitful action is worth the less-appealing light it puts the hero in in order to accomplish whatever purpose he had.

Think of a revision letter as a pair of eyes on all of your characters and storylines. If they’re doing something that doesn’t ring true to the book, it’s going to be questioned. But the most important thing to keep in mind is that a revision letter is like a conversation. So be sure to respond with any concerns or questions that you have after reading over your editor’s thoughts, and never hesitate to ask for clarification if you need it or are still confused on a certain point. The book will be stronger for it, when all is said and done!      

–From the The SYTYCW Archives…

Leave a Comment

Comments

  1. Mary Jane, it depends on the editor. Not every editor will specifically say Revision Request when they give rejections/feedback. Best thing to do is send ONE email as a follow-up, asking the editor if they’d be interested in seeing the story once more, after the points in the letter are addressed.

  2. I’ve been self-published and soon epublished, and the one thing I love about working with a company is having an editor. I always read that revision letter and say, NO! To almost everything they’ve recommended. haha. But if I put the letter aside and think about them, I find the revisions are usually sound advice. And, in the case of my book coming out in November, make my story way better than I perceived it as…and I thought it was pretty good!! 😀 I definitely think it’s about the conversation, though. I would expect an editor to listen to me as much as I listen to him/her, so we can come to an agreeable POV.

    • Chrissie

      I so agree, Bethany! In the R&Rs I’ve received I always read them, set them aside for a day or so and read again. Because the first thought is “what?” and then the dis-belief dust settles and I can see what it is they mean and that they are truly interested. I’ve never had an editor be mean or cruel. Always helpful, and I know that has improved my writing over the years. So a big thank you, editors! One and all. 🙂

  3. Patience Bloom

    Hi, Bethanne! Congratulations on your books coming out. That’s quite a feat! I completely understand the No instinct when it comes to reviewing revision letters (I’ve been on that side of the desk!). The thing to remember is that editors want a perfect manuscript so any request for revisions means that we are taking your work very seriously and wanting to help you get it to its best shape. Writing revision letters takes editors’ time, so we don’t do it for fun. But boy, there is such a reward when the revised manuscript comes in and it’s even better than we could have imagined. 🙂